ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 駒沢女子短期大学
  2. 駒沢女子短期大学 研究紀要
  3. 24

D. ジョンズのRPはどのように変質したか?

https://doi.org/10.18998/00000389
https://doi.org/10.18998/00000389
84bcc44b-0673-46a8-85a6-f4eb961e3be6
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
KJ00004251113.pdf KJ00004251113.pdf (882.6 kB)
Item type [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2016-08-04
タイトル
タイトル D. ジョンズのRPはどのように変質したか?
タイトル
タイトル What Has Happened to "Received Pronunciation"?
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
ID登録
ID登録 10.18998/00000389
ID登録タイプ JaLC
雑誌書誌ID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00093381
著者 佐々木, 英樹

× 佐々木, 英樹

佐々木, 英樹

ja-Kana ササキ, ヒデキ

Search repository
SASAKI, Hideki

× SASAKI, Hideki

en SASAKI, Hideki

Search repository
抄録(英)
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Although "Received Pronunciation" (RP) as described by Daniel Jones in his English Pronouncing Dictionary (EPD) was thoroughly descriptively oriented, it happened to become prescriptive and rose to the standard pronuncation of British English. It is the necessary result of the British Broadcasting Company (BBC)'s adoption of RP. Through the BBC, RP spread all over the country. The spreading of RP in turn caused the dilution of RP. RP was characterized by two distinct features in its origin. One is social features made up of social classes, educational background, and occupations. And the other is geographical features. Both features, however, got more and more indistinct in proportion as RP spread farther and farther (2.1 & 2.2). As a result it has become difficult to define RP by these two features, because both of them have ceased to be the defining characteristics of RP. Thus the present RP is more complex. Under these circumstances British phoneticans are seeking a third feature by which to define RP. Phonetic features are a promising candidate. Even though RP is familiar among the English, many linguists and lexicographers are not willing to admit that RP is the standard pronunciation (1.1 & 1.2). Why not? It does not seem that the word 'standard' is compatible with democracy. 'Sandard, ' 'Public School Pronunciation (PSP), ' or the like do not seem to be likable in the time of democracy. In an early edition of EPD, D. Jones suddenly abandoned the term PSP for an unknown reason and then adopted RP. It is probable that he thought the term RP was more acceptable to the public than PSP.
書誌情報 巻 24, p. 67-77, 発行日 1991-03-31
表示順
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 13
アクセション番号
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 KJ00004251113
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-20 15:31:30.087833
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3